What happened to Orkut, the social network launched by Google to combat Facebook and that we have all decided to forget

  • 44

If you travel to Rio de Janeiro and have a coffee —or already a good caipirinha— with a millennial, someone who lived their adolescence in the early 2000s, a word may come out during the conversation that leaves you unsettled: orkutização. Don’t worry. It’s not that the Portuguese skates you. Don’t bother looking it up in the dictionary, either, or pull out the translator. Orkutização It is one of those expressions that almost improvise themselves, that are born at the same time as their concept and give academics of the language a headache. Same as “random”, “bug” or “stalk”.

More or less you can translate as “die of success”, although not of any success. When something is orkutiza loses its air of sophistication and stop being “cool”. Linguistic disquisitions aside, the term was born attached to the networks and helps to understand the drift of platforms that have fallen from grace, such as Tuenti or MySpace. Why? Well, because the word itself comes from a network: Orkut, launched by Google in 2004 and, after adding millions of users, ended ousted in 2014.

Orkut’s death is explained by his orkutização; but also, and to a great extent, due to Google’s errant policy in the field of networks and its inability to stand up to competitors that knew how to position themselves better and connect with the public on a global level, such as Facebook.

This is the story of his birth, success, orkutização and bump.

“Connect Internet users”

In the early 2000s Google applied a standard that may seem eccentric at first, but that over time brought him great successes: he allowed his employees to dedicate 20% of their time in the office to personal projects. The only requirement, of course, was that they could benefit the company. Thanks to this initiative, AdSense, Google News… or the germ of a social network proposed by Orkut Büyükköktenan engineer almost recently landed at Google.

Büyükkökten did not reach the age of 30, but accumulated considerable experience with online communities. In 2001 he had presented Club Nexus at the Stanford University, shortly after inCircle, focused on groups of alumni, and in 2002 he had even dared with his own company, Affinity Engines. It was at Google, however, where he found space to shape his great project: a network capable of “connect all Internet users”.

What happened to Fotolog: the social network that baptized and then traumatized an entire generation of millennials

Mountain View liked the proposal and in 2004 Orkut was launched, named after its creator. His philosophy was as simple as his aesthetic. At first you accessed by invitation and the web allowed you to add friends, send messages, describe yourself, leave reflections, upload a handful of photos or classify your contacts. Compared to current networks, it’s not much, but it was used to locate old friends and there were even those who used it as a primitive Tinder.

The formula did not take long to gain adherents. Yes, with very uneven distribution. In some countries Orkut ended up becoming a phenomenon and in others it tiptoed. Among the first, without a doubt, Brazil stands out, which in the second half of 2004, even before the national domain was activated, already had around 700,000 users. There his success was such that until 2011, despite the orkutizaçãoor perhaps precisely thanks to her, still outperformed Facebook in traffic. At the end of that year, the Google network still registered 34 million unique visitors, with a growth of 10%.

6842251156 2014d7ccad H

In Spain it was also present, although with more discreet figures. In March 2011 we added 2% of its users, although there was already a community active enough to fill their accounts with black ties on the day of the 11-M attacks. If we want to get an idea of ​​how segmented its implementation was, take a look at Google data from 2006. At that time, 73.2% of Orkut users were Brazilian, 10.1% American, 2.8% Iranian, 2.4% Pakistani and 2.1% Indian. Spain did not even appear on the list.

The little pull of Orkut in Spain did not prevent that for some it was the gateway to the platforms social, a concept that for many was new. Fotolog and MySpace had been launched shortly before, Facebook and Flickr were launched the same year as Orkut and for Tuenti or Twitter we would have to wait until 2006. As for Instagram, it was not launched until 2010.

The Rise and Fall of Myspace: How Lack of Backup Took A Generation's Cultural Explosion

Although things did not go well for Orkut here, on the other side of the Atlantic it managed to gather a more than respectable parish and over the years it underwent some improvements. In 2007, after settling a dispute with Affinity Engines because of the origin of the code, Google redesigned your page; in 2009 it presented an improved version and in 2011 it released its logo and retouched its image. From that first version presented by Büyükkökten in 2002, a more comfortable and functional one was passed, with a feed with friend updates, video chat and better navigation.

Those tweaks didn’t stop Orkut from fading away. Although for a while it seemed to have become one of those “Galician villages” that were enduring the push of Facebook, like Tuenti in Spain or V Kontatakte in Russia, it soon ran out of steam in its own strongholds. In 2014 —just 10 years after its creation— Google announced the closure of its old platform and gave its users a margin of several months to recover their data. By then, Mark Zuckerberg’s social network was already the main platform, with 1.28 billion users.

2105433757 F396bf2c84 O

Beyond that process orkutização that permeated Brazil to the point of creating a school and sneaking into its dictionary, the end of Orkut is explained by a sum of factors. The main one, probably, was the lack of a clear strategy on the part of Google. As Genbeta explained in 2014, the network had grown very quickly, unpredictably, and without the Mountain View firm having a clear idea of ​​how to take advantage of it. In 2007 ran into problems when they started showing ads, monetization was not easy and maintenance was also complex.

To further complicate the scenario, there was the problem of how to expand it into new markets. In Brazil it worked well, but its limited implementation in other territories made it difficult for it to benefit from the network effect that did encourage Facebook. As for his image inside and outside of Brazil, it didn’t help that some users used the platform to commit serious crimes.

Faced with such a scenario, Google decided make a clean slate. Change of strategy and opted for Google+, a movement that in the end would not work out either. That didn’t mean that Orkut disappeared overnight; but the network began to languish. A good example is that its iPhone app didn’t come out until 2012, an ad that did not arouse much enthusiasm.

3608655865 Fe31b7290a B

when Google reported its closurein 2014, confirmed what was already a death foretold.

Almost 20 years after the birth of Orkut, however, part of its footprint survives.

If you query your domain (orkut.com) you will find a message from Büyükkökten in which he explains why he started the network and invites you to your new project, another platform in which he wants to recover the original philosophy of Orkut. His name, of course, has little farewell: Hello.

Images | GPDOC (Flickr)Kailash Naik (Flickr) and Gaurav Mishra (Flickr)

If you travel to Rio de Janeiro and have a coffee —or already a good caipirinha— with a millennial, someone…

If you travel to Rio de Janeiro and have a coffee —or already a good caipirinha— with a millennial, someone…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.